Control of hypertension in pregnancy.

The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. Complications are not limited to preeclampsia but also complicate both preexisting hypertension and isolated gestational hypertension. Blood pressure (BP) management is important but is only one aspect of management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, which may be caused or exacerbated by underlying uteroplacental mismatch between maternal supply and fetal demand. BP treatment thresholds and goals vary in international guidelines, largely reflecting differences in opinion rather than differences in published data. Because of short-term maternal risks, there is consensus that BP should be treated when sustained at greater than or equal to 160 to 170 mm Hg systolic and/or 110 mm Hg diastolic. There is no consensus regarding management of nonsevere hypertension, and randomized controlled trials involving just over 3000 women have not clarified the relative maternal and perinatal risks and benefits. Although antihypertensive therapy may decrease transient severe maternal hypertension, therapy may also impair fetal growth and perinatal health and outcomes. The CHIPS Trial (Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study) is recruiting to answer this question.

How to repair an anal sphincter injury after vaginal delivery: results of a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two surgical techniques and two types of suture material for anal sphincter repair after childbirth-related injury. DESIGN: Factorial randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary referral maternity unit. POPULATION: Women with an anal sphincter injury sustained during childbirth. METHOD: Women were randomised into four groups: overlap repair with polyglactin (Vicryl); end-to-end repair with polyglactin (Vicryl); overlap repair with polydioxanone (PDS); and end-to-end repair with PDS. All repairs were completed as a primary procedure by staff trained in both methods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Suture-related morbidity at six weeks. Bowel symptoms at 3, 6 and 12 months. Anorectal physiology at three months. Quality of life scores at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty women (1.5% of deliveries) were eligible and 112 (75%) were randomised. One hundred and three (92%) attended follow up visit at 6 weeks, 89 (80%) at 3 months, 79 (71%) at 6 months and 60 (54%) at 12 months. At six weeks, there was no difference in suture-related morbidity between groups (P=0.11) and 70% patients were completely asymptomatic. Incidence of bowel symptoms and quality of life disturbances were low, with no differences between the four groups. CONCLUSION: Obstetric anal sphincter repair carried out by appropriately trained staff is associated with low morbidity, irrespective of the suture material and repair method used.

Pregnancy in women with pre-existing diabetes: management issues.

Despite significantly increased input from multidisciplinary teams during the antenatal period, pregnancy outcomes for women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes remain substantially worse than that of the general obstetric population. Regarding fetal congenital malformations, these are likely to be preventable only by strategies introduced prior to pregnancy. The relationship between fetal macrosomia and glycaemic control is complex, and reducing the incidence of macrosomia may be possible only by novel management strategies that address the wide fluctuations in blood glucose over a 24-hour period. Irrespective of pregnancy diabetes control, the complication of neonatal hypoglycaemia can largely be avoided by tight control of glucose values during labour and delivery. The continued lack of understanding of the pathophysiology of late fetal death in diabetic pregnancies and the shortcomings of current methods of antenatal fetal surveillance make it likely that infants of diabetic mothers will continue to be delivered preterm, with the attendant implications of neonatal morbidity and cost.

Pregnancy outcome in severe placental abruption.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between decision to delivery interval and perinatal outcome in severe placental abruption. DESIGN: A case-control study. SETTING: Large inner city teaching hospital. METHODS: Retrospective case note review of pregnancies terminated following severe placental aburption and fetal bradycardia. One year paediatric follow up by case note review or postal questionnaire. The differences in outcome (death or cerebral palsy) were examined using non-parametric and univariate analysis for the following time periods--times from onset of symptoms to delivery, onset of symptoms to admission, admission to delivery, onset bradycardia to delivery and decision to delivery interval. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prenatal death or survival with cerebral palsy. RESULTS: Thirty-three women with singleton pregnancies over 28 weeks of gestation, admitted with clinically overt placental abruption, where delivery was effected for fetal bradycardia. Eleven of the pregnancies had a poor outcome (cases), eight infants died and three surviving infants have cerebral palsy. Twenty-two pregnancies had a good outcome (controls): survival with no developmental delay. No statistically significant relationship was found between maternal age, parity, gestation, or birthweight and a poor outcome. A statistically significant relationship between time from decision to delivery was identified (P = 0.02, Mann-Whitney U test). The results of a univariate logistic regression for this variable suggest that the odds ratio of a poor outcome for delivery at 20 minutes compared with 30 minutes is 0.44 (95% CI 0.22-0.86). Fifty-five percent of infants were delivered within 20 minutes of the decision to deliver. Serious maternal morbidity was rare. CONCLUSION: In this small study of severe placental abruption complicated by fetal bradycardia, a decision to delivery interval of 20 minutes or less was associated with substantially reduced neonatal morbidity and mortality.